Monday, November 11, 2024

Value for the Patient at Globex

I don't normally look at companies like this but Globex Mining Enterprises (GLBXF) is not what you think.  They have an incredible balance sheet with $7.5m USD cash + $13.5m in investments.  The CEO hates debt so they have none, carrying only a couple hundred grand in current payables.  

As I type, the stock is at $0.75 USD giving a market cap of $42m.  Book value is $24.3m with $20.8m of that being cash + securities.  They own their buildings outright and carry those around a million.  Add that up and the market is valuing the operating company at about $20m.  

This is where it gets interesting because Globex is really a hidden balance sheet play.  The company owns 252 mining properties and 106 mining royalties, all of which are carried at zero because the frugal CEO doesn't want to pay auditors for assessments.  Your job today is decide if you think those 252 properties and 106 royalties are worth more than $20m USD.  

Globex calls themself a Mineral Property Bank.  I think of them as basically a value investor focused on mining properties and the stock picker is CEO Jack Stoch.  One of the risks is how dependent they are on Jack and what happens when he's gone.  He's an older guy who's been running the company since 1987.  In this interview he talks about the beginning.  Jack is a geologist who bought up a mining property from the previous rendition of the company for $500 CAD.  The company went down to nothing and owners wanted a tax loss, so he bought their shares for pennies.  Down the line a broker convinced him to take it public so he put the property back in and started it up.  The company is based in Canada and listed in Canada (TSX: GMX), USA (OTCQX: GLBXF), and Germany (FSE: G1MN).  I own the US listed stock GLBXF and my brain works in US dollars but in this article I quote Canadian dollars in many places because that's what the company press releases, reports, and inverviews are in.  Right now the internet tells me $1 USD = $1.39 CAD and $1 CAD = $0.72 USD.

What Globex does is basically Jack acquires mining assets when they're out of favor then patiently waits for sentiment to turn while also doing work on the properties to increase their value and visibility.  That work might be drilling samples, carrying out surveys, or paying a qualified person for inspections and reports.  The company has 12 employees with half of those being geologists.  As far as I can tell Jack handles negotiations.  

Globex's preferred way of making money from their properties is a 4 year option deal.  Some other company comes in and pays globex to mine on the property.  The other company has to come up with the huge Capex requirements for mining, processing, logistics, etc while Globex just sits and receives option payments.  At the end of the deal if the other company has made the payments and met the requirements then they get the property while Globex retains a Gross Metal Royalty (GMR) of something like 3%.  Under the terms of a 3% GMR the company must pay Globex 3% of the gross amount of whatever mineral is pulled out of the ground forever.  Here's an example from the most recent annual


That example illustrates the pieces of their deals.  Globex spends nothing and incurs zero risk while just receiving option payments.  The other company has to spend a certain amount on the property which also increases the value of the property itself.  I think it's sort of an extreme example, but Jack has a property called the Duquesne West/Ottoman Gold Project which he has optioned off 7 times.  Each time Globex receives cash and/or shares while these other companies do work on the property.  The other company is taking all the mining risks of raising capital, permitting, facilities construction, mineral pricing, political uncertainty.  The other company is actually raising the value of the property in question as they build on it or dig up samples.  Then if the other company doesn't fulfill part of the agreement the property falls back to Globex.  

Every year Globex does spend a couple million doing work on their properties.  They drill up samples and pay for studies.  It's all to increase the value and visibility on their properties.  I've listened to several YouTube interviews with the CEO.  See here, here, here, here (pro-tip you can double the playback speed).   One thing Jack talks about is not buying grassroots projects or speculative junk.  He buys properties with real tangible value that has been explored or looked at somehow in the past.  He'll buy former mines.  He'll buy properties next to active mines.  He'll buy when prior owners go bankrupt or markets turn south.  Jack hates debt and risk so he doesn't partake.  Globex owns all their properties, buildings, vehicles outright.  Jack only deals in democratic areas with as little political risk as he can get so they own properties in Canada, USA, and Germany.

This Globex writeup has a good example of Jack's deal making and the Globex value proposition, illustrated with their Lac Fortune Gold Property.  

"100% ownership of a past-producing mine with modern infrastructure for what ultimately turned out to be just $25,000 in actual cash plus a couple million in the coming years in exploration expenses Not too shabby, right? Even if this project had just sat in Globex’s catalogue to this day gathering dust, I don’t think anyone would complain about the concept of turning $25,000 into a past-producing gold mine and upgrading it with new discoveries. So it is clear Jack knows how to shop for a good deal.

But that isn’t where the story ends if you remember where I started this update. To be clear - it isn’t just gathering dust. In fact, Globex sold this project to Yamana Gold (now PAAS) in 2021 (though now owned by Agnico Eagle) as Yamana sought to consolidate its own land package in the area. The price tag? $11 million in cash over 4 years, and $4 million in shares up front (which are now worth $5m). So Jack turned $25,000 into an old gold mine, then followed that up with a few hundred meters of trenching and shallow drilling to revitalise the property, which in turn lead to it being sold for some $15+ million in total equity . That’s a ~7.5X on invested capital - for those keeping track out there - in just 5 years of ownership."
These deals are how Globex has acquired their extensive stock portfolio.  Below is from the most recent quarterly

This YouTube interview has a few more examples of Jack's deal making.  He talks about a Uranium property originally bought for $5k CAD which he sold for $600k plus stock.  Talks about another property he got for under $300 CAD by staking and sold for a couple million shares, $100k cash, and a royalty.  He mentions another which he's optioning for the 3rd time with a 4 year deal for $6.4m CAD cash, $4.8m in shares, $12.25m work they must do on the property, $100k/yr advance royalty, 3% GMR.  Each time optioning the land the company has moved it forward and each time Globex has made money.  

In this interview he mentions optioning out one property which they believe already has over $30m CAD in work done on it.  Another property has over 800k ounces of gold (that would be $2b total at current price).  He talks about buying one property for $1k CAD.  

A big uncertainty with all of this is timing.  One example from this interview is a property Globex owned that was under water, literally under a lake.  Globex did some drilling to prove the value of what was there and the logical buyer was an active mine next to the lake.  Jack said it took 25 years to get the deal done and in the end he got over $1m CAD cash.

If mining companies are spending $30m CAD on a property they must believe it could generate many times that once in production.  But how much time does it take to get to production along with all those obstacles along the road, that's the risk.  

If you look at Globex financials over the years you can see a big spike in revenue in 2021.  They did two big deals that year.  In March 2021 they sold two zinc royalties from their Mid-Tennessee property for $18m CAD in stock and cash.  In June 2021 they sold the Lac Fortune Gold property to Yamaha Gold for $15m CAD.  


Lac Fortune was acquired by Globex in March 2020 so that payout was less than two years.  Mid-Tennessee was sold by Globex to Nyrstar in 2009 and Globex collected royalties for a decade before this big deal.  You just really don't know the timing on these things

If you think about all those deals while zooming out with the big picture you can see this has the look of a snowball rolling down a hill.  Below are a couple pictures from the most recent investor presentation.  



Now think about that while looking at this long range chart.  The big stock movement at the start of 2006 came when they listed on the German stock exchange.  Jack said there was a stock newsletter written there in Germany and interest drove it way up.  Then in late 2007 the company was approached with a buyout offer at $7 CAD = $6 USD at the time.   The deal fell through but I mention it just to add a piece to the puzzle of what this thing is worth.  Given the share count that's $108m USD when Globex had 76 properties and 6 royalties, whereas now Globex has 252 properties and 106 royalties available to you for $20m USD.  


Overall I just don't think the market has kept up with all of Jack's deal making and acquisitions.  Let's overlay market cap on top of that picture with number of projects and royalties.  

If we show revenue and cash against that market cap you can see the stock has just stagnated against the company progress.  Revenue is rising as more and more of the royalties start paying and deals work out.  Cash & securities are growing for the same reason.  
One thing I don't love is the share count with 56m outstanding.  If you listen to those YouTube interviews you'll hear the CEO brag about how low the share count is and how they never dilute.  It reminds me how every statement made is relative to one's experience.  In my world this is a lot of shares and too much dilution but in the mining world I think it's peanuts.  But really this is just another indication of the snowball rolling down the hill towards prosperity.  They used to issue stock via private placements every year to fund the exploration and deals.  You can see all the announcements in their press releases.  The last private placement was in 2019 around the time buybacks started.  Globex has bought back 2.5m shares over the past 6 years and has an active program right now to buy back up to 1m shares per year.  


All of that is to say I think the decades are deal making are starting to show good progress.

In this interview Jack was asked what he'll do with the cash and how he will try to close the gap between intrinsic value and stock price.  He basically said he's going to continue doing what he does but maybe he can take bigger swings at the plate.  Rather than spending a couple million CAD per year on exploration and work on his properties maybe he can double that.  He said he's starting to put together larger group deals of his properties.  He said he gets approached all the time about selling off royalties and he can start grouping those together as well.   He's said he doesn't like dividends since their revenue is lumpy.  He does like doing stock buybacks which they are doing.  He said they have considered bundling up properties and/or royalties to spin off to shareholders.  

The two big risks I see are Jack himself and time.  Jack is getting older and I don't know if anyone else can do what he does.  In this interview he talks about trying to find a successor which he has tried for some time it sounds like.  He says he does not want to do this until he dies but he will not leave shareholders in a bad position.  His replacement has to be able to evaluate all these properties from a geology point of view as well as negotiate which he says is the hard part to find.  He talks about how he needs to find someone who values shareholders money more than their own pocket book.  Jack and his wife are the largest shareholders with ~11% of the stock after all.  Overall he just sounds perfect to do what he is doing and for us as shareholders.  He is incredibly risk averse, patient, and optimistic.  

The time risk I don't know what to say other than that plus the confusion about what this company could actually be worth are why we have this opportunity in the first place.  The stock doesn't screen since he has all the properties and royalties valued at 0 on the books.  Globex owns so many different things I don't know how anyone could put an accurate number on the value.  As Jack says in some of those interviews, Globex owns over half the periodic table.  

So then what is it worth.  Let's go through a few examples of the properties and royalties.  Again keep in mind the market will sell this whole bucket of properties plus royalties to you for $20m.  

Here is a writeup on Globex under which the author tries to value various properties and royalties.  I'll just note a few of the numbers. 
  • Nordeau has 311k ounces of indicated + inferred gold which would be worth $16m USD to Globex with the 3% GMR if it gets into production
  • Kewaga is a similar story worth $7.1m USD if in production
  • Labyrinth $26m USD if in production
  • Parbec $14m USD if in production
  • Duquesne West $26m USD if in production
There is a high risk of any one of the project getting into production but the point here is Globex has so many and of such varied types that risk is spread out.  We don't know the timing on any single one of them but Globex has been acquiring and working on these for decades so as we move forward the chances of payout go up as you can see by the increased royalty revenue over the years.  

This YouTube interview has a good section where Jack talks about a handful of properties that excite him.  One is the Timmons Talc-Magnesite Project which the company bought out of receivership in 2000.  In the interview he talks about Talc as being the exciting aspect.  He says high brightness talc is used in plastics production and right now all the high brightness talc in the world comes from China.  Well he has this huge deposit in Canada with a projected mining useful life of hundreds of years.  This study from 2012 estimates a net present value (NPV) of ~$150m USD and I can only imagine it'd be much higher now.  Jack said he is searching for the right partner.  He had a couple firms interested then covid hit.  As of the YouTube interview one of them had come back to the table and were coming to do their own investigative work on the property.  

Mont Sorcier is a property Globex maintains a 1% GMR on all iron from.  This study estimates a 37 year life of the mine at 5m tons annual production with 65% of that being iron.  At $100 USD per ton that means $3.25m USD royalty per year to Globex.  All of these examples are subject to the risk the mines actually get into and stay in production, but you get the idea.  

Battery Hill is a manganese royalty property.  This press release talks about a study that estimates a 47 year mine life with $177m annual revenue.  Globex holds a 1% GMR which would deliver $1.77m USD annually that whole time.  Again if in production.  

I'll finish example hour with Ironwood which is a gold deposit in Globex's Wood / Central Cadillac property.  At the moment I think this one has the highest potential to be a game changer and most likely to be a short term catalyst.  This one exemplifies the Jack's patient approach.  The oldest report on Globex's website is from 2003 and it notes "We also transformed Globex’s back-in right in the Wood Gold Mine property into a 50% ownership right and Globex became project manager." and "The discovery by Agnico-Eagle of a significant gold deposit approximately 4km to the East on the same stratagraphic horizon which traverses the Wood property has increased the importance and economic potential of the property."  From 2004 to 2022 Globex had a JV on the property did work there studying, drilling, etc.  In 2008 they put out a report showing an estimated 243k tons at 17.26 g/t of gold there.  That would mean 4.2m grams of gold = about $370m USD at current prices.  The JV was terminated in 2022 and somehow that led to Globex getting a 100% interest in the property.  The 2019 annual report mentions Globex buying a previously existing 1.5% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR) on the property.  The 2021 annual report and the 2022 press release talk about Globex buying more of the underlying claims and royalties.  Jack talks about Ironwood in this YouTube interview at about the 30min mark.  He says it's a very small deposit of extremely high grade.  To mine it requires no permanent infrastructure and it can be treated at a local mill.  There are already paved roads, power, labor, and everything you'd need right there so capital costs are very small.  No guarantees of course but he believes it can be mined with a ramp in about 28 months and it'll provide "a big slug of cash."  Here's another CEO interview on YouTube where he talks about Ironwood, posted on Sept 30, 2024.  Jack talks about using their cash this year to drill a couple of properties.  Normally they don't drill themself but he plans this because he thinks doing this themself will greatly increase the value of the properties.  He says they plan to use Novamera which is a new process that is supposed to make capital costs go way down.  Sounds like they basically drill the hold and dump that into trucks which go to the local mill for processing.  That's why Jack is talking about low costs and easy logistics.  I don't love Globex doing the mining themself since that's a change of business model but I'm basically trusting Jack here.  He is super risk averse and hates debt.  He's been working on and thinking about this property for at least 20 years.  He said he's been approached even very recently about selling the property but they wouldn't pay what he knows it's worth.  Maybe once he starts pulling up gold that'll change.  

I am going to leave the story there.  I could go on with more deal examples and more property potential but you get the idea.  Globex has a great website you should check out if you want more info.  Here are all their press releases going back to 2003.  Here are reports back to 2003.  All the properties are here.  Investor presentation here.  

Youtube video interviews of the CEO herehereherehere.  Some stock writeup here, here, here, here, here.  

Positives on this one are the balance sheet and incredible amount of potential carried at zero.  Negatives are you will have to wait and I don't know how long.  I don't see how the stock is not very cheap, but the question is how do we get to the promised land.  

Below are the recent press releases, showing how much is going on.  It reminds me of my own diversified stock portfolio full of things here and there acquired when the market wasn't interested.  So now I sit and wait for someone to get interested.



--Dan
disclosure: long GLBXF



Subscribe to all NoNameStocks posts here: https://forms.feedblitz.com/erd

28 comments:

  1. Nice writeup! I've been researching Globex for the past couple of weeks and got to the following conclusion.

    1) Globex has a few interesting properties with NI 43-101 reports that have big NPV numbers exceeding GMX's market cap. However, most of these projects will never be built, and if they are built it will take a loooong time. The opportunity cost is just too high. In my opinion the most conservative approach is to just assume almost all of these are worthless.

    2) Which projects are not worthless (and could be potential catalysts?) I believe Ironwood and Mont Sorcier are not worthless.

    2.1) Ironwood
    Globex will do some infill drilling on Ironwood and the results should be out by December. If the results are positive, they will mine it and according to Jack, they'll get "a net profit of $100M USD"
    I think that is too optimistic, specially considering it's only an inferred resource. According to my estimates, it probably has an NPV between 40M - 80M CAD. I used a 26.67% discount rate and used a price of gold of 2,200 USD/oz. Perhaps I'm being too conservative, but once again, it's still only an inferred resource + Novamera (the company that will do the drilling) is a new company + surgical mining was never done in Quebec so permitting migth take some time.

    2.2) Mont Sorcier is also interesting and probably has an NPV around 7.5M - 13.5M CAD. I used iron prices that varied from 40 USD/ton - 100 USD/ton or 75 USD/ton - 135 USD/ton if you include the vanadium and grade premiums. Additionally I used a 26.67% discount rate and assumed the project would start prodction in 4 years. I believe my estimates were very conservative.

    In summary, I think Globex is an interesting way to get exposure to risky projects (mainly Ironwood) because even if these projects fail they have a fortress balance sheet + a ton of projects that are probably worthless and if any of these projects do pan out, that´s free upside.

    Disclaimer: I do own Globex shares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing your analysis. If commodity prices rise during a commodity supercycle which could be underway, then perhaps many of these previously worthless projects would become profitable, and could then be built sooner than expected. Not required for the stock to work, but I still like having the chance to swing for the fences.

      Delete
    2. Why do you say that most of this projects will never be built?
      I know nothing about mining but I'm trying to understand the industry. We do know that the amount of acres will never increase and demand for minerals will always increase.

      Delete
  2. With so many royalties, why is the revenue is still pretty small at just a few million? Are they mostly not in production yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes only a few are actively paying. most are just sitting there as potential for the future, or a graveyard of failure I guess depending on how you look at it

      Delete
  3. None of them are in production.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Long holder. Limited downside with tremendous upside.

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of the interviews cites the Ironwood Project NPV calculated as an estimated $258 million. Can that value be fully attributed to Globex? That alone would make the stock worth 6x the current price!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The studies give different estimates on NPV assuming many things including a discount rate. That is like some qualified person was paid and did research and came up with an estimate.

      as far as attributed to Globex that's where I"m not sure. That's why I mentioned the stuff about Globex buying some of the underlying claims and NSRs associated. I don't know if that was all cleaned out

      Delete
    2. I think the$258M is the NPV of their Timmins Talc property, not Ironwood. Jack mentioned they were trying to find someone to put it into production and were currently in discussions with a group in the US, however, he doesn't know if they are trying to eliminate a competitor or actually trying to take it into production. I honestly don't know if this will be taken into production, but I assume it won't because according to Jack, it's difficult to carry forward. Even if it is taken into production, Globex will probably option the property to someone else and they won't get the entire $258M.

      Delete
  6. What an in-depth dive into the intricacies of Globex, super ! I am a longterm shareholder, since 2007. And yes it took longer than I thought to see appreciation (more often than not gains were lost again due to the vagaries of the markets). But it is not appropriate to distefard the royalty package. F.e. there is a 2 % GMR on Wasamac of Agnico wich still has 2027 as its planned production date. Or take O'Brian of Radisson , we have a 2 % royalty on part of it. Judging from the share price , the markets expect this going into production....

    ReplyDelete
  7. I found this quote exciting for gold bulls: "...Doing more acquisitions to be ready for when for example the gold market turns. When the gold market turns, we're going to be doing deals hands over fist. We're going to be one of the few companies that actually has really good gold assets. And we're putting together regional plays. Not only individual projects, but serious regional plays." (Around 4:30 from https://youtu.be/E3lc4-YhUzU?si=nTjBkd0X1Ys8w38p)

    Goehring & Rozencwajg recently wrote, "In essence, gold equities today offer an unprecedented combination of low valuation and high potential return. Normally, when a commodity reaches new highs, investor interest is intense and valuations are stretched. Yet in the case of gold stocks, investor interest remains muted. Even as gold has rallied, investors have continued to withdraw funds from gold equity ETFs, with $1.5 billion redeemed from the GDX thus far in 2024—a testament to the widespread disinterest in the sector."

    https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/gold-stocks-cheap

    ReplyDelete
  8. I find Globex a potentially intriguing investment, but with one major concern…

    The author of this article indicates: “I think it's sort of an extreme example, but Jack has a property called the Duquesne West/Ottoman Gold Project which he has optioned off 7 times. Each time Globex receives cash and/or shares while these other companies do work on the property. The other company is taking all the mining risks of raising capital, permitting, facilities construction, mineral pricing, political uncertainty. The other company is actually raising the value of the property in question as they build on it or dig up samples. Then if the other company doesn't fulfill part of the agreement the property falls back to Globex.”

    While that all sounds great, the other way to look at this example is that the optionees struck out 7 times! While Globex does make some money even as each optionee strikes out, the big money in business models like Globex comes when mines actually go into production and the royalty payments kick in.

    Globex has a poor track record of generating royalty revenue. Is that because the properties weren’t good properties to begin with? Or is it because Globex doesn’t do a good job of optioning off the properties to solid partners who have strong ability to bring the properties into production? Both? Something else? Anyone out there have an informed point of view on these questions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one way to look at it. I don't know how to judge as I'm not really into mining. I would say if companies keep coming back to a property and giving it a go 7 times there must be something there. As people work on it they are adding infrastructure and revealing new information, discovering new things. I guess you have to judge for yourself if the new information revealed is good or bad

      Delete
    2. That’s what each of the 7 optionees on that property thought, too! But 6 (or 7) times they gave up. And, yet, if my reading of the data is correct, there is still not a PRODUCING royalty on that property. Why?

      Globex was founded in the 1960’s. The key question: when will it produce meaningful royalty revenue? (Or just “revenue” in the case of Ironwood, etc.)

      Delete
    3. Jack started at Globex with a single property in 1987. Nothing in the 1960s is relevant

      Globex sold 2 royalties in 2021 for over $18m CAD. Seems meaningful given the market values their current 252 properties + 106 royalties for $20m USD.

      In the "just revenue" column Globex sold one property plus a bunch of claims in 2021 for $15m CAD.


      https://www.globexmining.com/staging/admin/news_pdfs/2021-03-11%20Globex%20Agrees%20to%20Sell%20Two%20Royalties%20for%20$13%20million%20Cash%20and%20Significant%20Equity%20(003).pdf

      https://www.globexmining.com/staging/admin/news_pdfs/2021-06-22%20Globex%20Completes%20Sale%20of%20Francoeur_Arntfield_Lac%20Fortune%20Gold%20Property%20to%20Yamana%20Gold.pdf

      Delete
  9. OK, I’ll go with your suggestion to ignore anything that happened from 60’s to 1987. But, 1987 is 37 years ago. How many of the 106 royalties created since then are PRODUCING royalty revenue for Globex? For whatever number you supply please indicate if that number is a good track record for 37 years! : )

    ReplyDelete
  10. As a conservative investor, I would not pay more than the book value as long as the company does not generate sustainable profits or high sales (e.g. p/s ratio < 1). However, the market value is $42m and the book value is only $24.3m. Globally, there are much cheaper shares. In other words, I wouldn't invest there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The whole point of this article is GLBXF has 252 properties and 106 royalties carried on the books at zero so book value does not reflect the true value of the company.

      Delete
    2. Yes, but they don't seem to be able to convert that into profits very well, e.g. the average profit over the last 10 years was around 1.8 million and the median was -0.4 million.

      Delete
  11. Dan — Your comment above is directionally true for the vast majority of mineral royalty companies that have a “project generation” component to their business. Companies like Altius Minerals, EMX, and others also have large property & royalty portfolios (e.g. EMX has over 100 royalties), but investors and analysts typically don’t assign much value to those non producing royalty portfolios (notable exception: royalties that are in “advanced development” are assigned higher values than “development” or “advanced exploration” or “exploration” royalties).

    When investors and investment analysts value these kinds of companies they value them largely as the sum of 4 buckets of assets: 1) they value cash at about 1x, 2) they value a portfolio of public exploration and development mining stocks (received as part of the deals struck for some properties) at a significant liquidity discount to their market value, 3) they assign very little value to portfolio of pre production royalties (with the exception, as noted above, of “advanced development” royalties, which can get higher assigned values), 4) yet they’ll value long lived PRODUCING royalties at 6-10x annual royalty payments. Bucket 4 is where most of the value is created. In fact, bucket 4, PRODUCING royalties, is where Globex created much of its recent value (sold assets including a PRODUCING royalty to Electric Royalties in 2021).

    A huge difference between Altius, EMX and others versus Globex is that those companies have created a far better track record of turning properties into PRODUCING royalties, and they’ve done it in far less time. EMX Royalty was formed in 2003 (as Eurasian Minerals) and has a market cap of ~$200M U.S. Altius Minerals was formed in 1997 and has a market cap of ~840M U.S.

    I’ll grant that the Ironwood property seems intriguing, and “could” be a game changer, IF the Novamera “surgical mining technology” can work on the property if desired. If that happens, then that property alone could justify a higher Globex share price, regardless of whether Globex funds production itself, or brings in a production partner and keeps a royalty, or sells the whole thing off as an “advanced development” project and doesn’t keep a royalty. In any of these cases, the property would have gotten much further along than probably 99% of Globex properties.

    Setting Ironwood aside, the biggest question is not why the market is assigning zero book value to Globex’ 252 properties and 106 royalties (because, as stated above that happens with most prospect generation portfolios in other businesses), the biggest question is, why the company has such a poor track record of turning properties into PRODUCING royalties, which is where much of the investor upside is in these business models. How “patient” does an investor have to be since this company was founded in the 1960’s (but as you said, we should consider 1987 as the start…and I said “that’s 37 years ago!), and there are other businesses like this that have built many times the market value of Globex in significantly less time?

    It’s well past time to move this business beyond a “mineral property bank”, which implies nothing about PRODUCING properties and PRODUCING royalties, to something much more valuable…call it what you will…how about a “ROYALTY property bank,” that gets valued like this: 6-10 x (sum of forward 12 months expected royalty revenue of long lived royalties)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just want to be clear about the main point of my article. Globex carries all of it's properties and royalties at a value of 0 on the books. So they are not included in book value. That is the hidden value which affects how Globex screens and appears at first sight. Your statement about "that happens with most prospect generation portfolios in other businesses" is not true at least in your examples.

      Altius ATUSF carries its royalties at $203m CAD as of the most recent report, plus $9m CAD in "Exploration and evaluation assets" whatever that is.

      EMX has $42m in "Royalty and other property interests".

      That is the difference I'm trying to get across. I understand you think Globex does a poor job of converting properties to cash so you feel it's of lower quality that those other companies.

      Delete
    2. Altius is trading at 26.25-- Globex at .76-- "You Pay A Very High Price In The Stock Market For A Cheery Consensus." Warren Buffett

      Delete
  12. Two corrections to my post above:
    1) The property and royalty portfolio is NOT valued at zero, but instead in the low 10’s of millions (consistent with how such non revenue producing property/royalty portfolios are valued in other like businesses).
    2) I should have suggested calling it a “PRODUCING ROYALTY property bank” and not just a “ROYALTY property bank.” There are probably better words than those, but directionally I believe this is the vision the company needs to pursue if it really wants to unlock value. Otherwise the company will be dinkering around with a far, far less interesting business model where it, for example, it options off a property 7x and none of the optionees takes it to production, like it did in the example indicated earlier in this thread. Yeah, that’s better than a zero, but what we REALLY want is 1 optionee per property who then takes it into production, and mints royalty revenue for Globex.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Commodities have been out of favor the past decade; therefore, it makes sense that Globex would have underperformed. Their strategy is to buy cheap assets when they're out of favor, so logically there may have been fewer quality mining partners during that period, and they may have struggled to raise capital.

    It seems that Globex may not be hurt by choosing a sub-par partner and sometimes benefits by any progress made by the partner if they can't finish the project to take ownership.

    During the last commodity bull market Globex went from $0.20 in 2000 to a peak of $2.65 in 2011 (ignoring the spike to $7 from the potential buyout), so perhaps we can expect something similar over the next decade.

    ReplyDelete
  14. To the anonymous poster above, here are my responses:
    1) It is also the strategy of Altius Minerals, and others like it to buy cheap assets when they’re out of favor. Altius has built an $875M (U.S.) market cap business, starting in 1997. By contrast, Globex has built a $43M (U.S,) market cap business, starting in 1987 (that date according to original poster). Said differently, Globex market cap is about 5% the market cap of Altius, and has been in business a decade or more longer than Altius.

    2) It doesn’t “hurt” to have sub-par partners who can’t finish a job to advance a property. If Globex had a track record of generating royalties by getting multiple successive sub-par partners to advance any one property, that would be a great thing. But they don’t. How many revenue producing royalty properties does Globex have? How many has it created since inception? The numbers are not good, particularly compared to Altius and others like it.

    3) When a company hasn’t had time for its business model to pan out (i.e. hasn’t had time to produce interesting financials), then the market value of that company is often valued on speculation, and/or confidence in the executive team, and/or vision. That may help explain what happened in the 2000-2011 time frame you cite.

    However, when a company has had 37 years for its business model to work and it’s produced very little royalty revenue, and it’s only produced a $43M U.S. market cap, then that track record needs to be taken into account in assessing the speculative value, the management team, and the vision, which is why I suspect “the market” is not willing to assign more than $20-$25M to the entire property/royalty portfolio. It’s always fun to “hope” investors will assign a higher speculative value to a company, but after almost 4 decades in business it’s time that this company increasingly get valued on real and growing financial results, and less about speculation.

    I will continue to argue that Globex’ market cap potential will be held back unless and until it can generate a growing top line of royalty revenue. On a related note, Globex would be advised to overhaul its investor presentation. The current presentation has an enormous number of slides with geological maps. I think it’d be great if future investor presentations cut out 1/2 or more of those geological maps, and added maybe 2 slides that provided deeper, more compelling progress reports on the more advanced properties…not unlike how Altius, EMX, and others that have a project generation business model. The current presentation may speak well to geologists and others with geology backrounds, but thats a fraction of 1% of the potential investors that Globex could attract. The other 99%+ of potential investors have little or no geology background and don’t understand and/or care about geology maps…they just want to see that a company is progressing towards generating interesting financials.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Dan
    You always say you look for max stock movement. It used to be in micro cap. But last 2 years it was much Eisner to get it in mega caps or mega caps leaps. Didn’t you shift some assets to the easy money we had in this bull market of mega?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Globex Reports First Four Infill Ironwood Drill Holes: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/12/04/2991641/0/en/Globex-Reports-First-Four-Infill-Ironwood-Drill-Holes.html

    I´m not a mining expert, but the infill drilling results seem really positive. The grades are high and hole SIW-24-03 has a true width of 11.08m.

    ReplyDelete